tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8355717446968368001.post6292481936278989560..comments2024-03-22T13:31:48.474-04:00Comments on Art Now and Then: Jennifer D'ArcyJim Lanehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05882369817190401530noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8355717446968368001.post-32755813335962830382016-11-13T07:16:29.718-05:002016-11-13T07:16:29.718-05:00My dear unknown--
You're correct in suggestin...My dear unknown--<br /><br />You're correct in suggesting I've been rejected--many, many times, in fact, though not by the Archibald people (I'm not Australian). Rejection of my work or that of Miss D'Arcy is not a factor here. If you'll note the tenor of the piece I was not particularly harsh on the artist, only on those who were "using" her to sell a very expensive, and highly impractical art medium. Anyone who can paint portraits with nail polish is talented enough to paint much BETTER portraits in a more traditional medium. In striving for success, she's simply making it harder for herself with her gimmicky choice of media.Jim Lanehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05882369817190401530noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8355717446968368001.post-74078352597263120912016-11-13T04:38:15.868-05:002016-11-13T04:38:15.868-05:00Your statements are very unkind and judgemental an...Your statements are very unkind and judgemental and it sounds like you have a chip on your shoulder! Did you get rejected? The artwork should be judged on what it is alone, not a who's who, or, how many times have you entered. Her artwork is very good. Leave her alone! Mskerriehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09703280772383839176noreply@blogger.com