What the Mannerists were up against, The Libyan Sibyl, 1506, Sistine Chapel, Michelangelo |
How would you like to have been a painter in the late
1500's? How would you like to have followed an act like Michelangelo or Raphael,
or Leonardo Da Vinci. That was the plight of painters like Tiziano Vecellio and
Jacopo Robusti, better known today by what amount to "stage" names--Titian and
Tintoretto respectively. All about them were the much-heralded glories of the
high Renaissance, the Sistine Chapel, and the Mona Lisa. They were left in the
unenviable position of having to at least match the godlike painting masters of
the past just to attain some measure of respectability in their own time. Moreover,
they were burdened by the knowledge that if they were to be remembered beyond
their own time, they would have to somehow surpass them.
Actually, art
historians would tell us today that they, in fact, did neither. But it wasn't
from a lack of trying. The artistic era following the Renaissance has come to be
known today as the "Mannerist" period, a kind of poor stepchild in the artistic
scheme of things, sandwiched in between the colossal periods of the Renaissance
and the Baroque eras--a somewhat weak and unstable bridge between the two.
Artistic themes fostered in the Renaissance played themselves out during this
period while the dramatic seeds of the flamboyant Baroque style were planted and
germinated. And in the midst of this, painters struggled to be themselves, and
to be more than the sum total of their work.
Venus of Urbino, 1538, Titian, a meager attempt to out-Raphael Raphael. |
Mannerist sculptors went after the legend of Michelangelo as well, as seen here in Gianbologna's spiraling Rape of the Sabine Women, 1583. |
No comments:
Post a Comment