Reina Sophia National Contemporary Art Museum, Madrid, Spain |
Here's a question for you. If you were the curator of a major art museum, what
artist or artists might you draw from in putting together an important
exhibition? What theme might you use? What might you call the show, aside from
the ever-present colon in the middle of the title? What artist would you choose?
Dürer? Rembrandt? Monet? Cézanne? Matisse? Rockwell? Wyeth? Picasso? Okay, given
this list, adding others if you like, which artist's work might you think would
be the most difficult to pull together for a major exhibit? It might surprise
you, but curators all over the world would quickly choose their pick--Picasso.
Certainly Paloma Estaban would echo that sentiment. Paloma was a curator at the
Reina Sophia National Contemporary Art Museum in Madrid. And if you've never
heard of this museum before, you might want to remember the name. It's where you
would go if you wanted to see Picasso's Guernica.
Guernica, 1937, Pablo Picasso |
Several years ago (2001), when Paloma began putting together a Picasso retrospective, "Picasso: the
Great Series," she sent out some 200 letters to museums and collectors all over
the world. She got back only one response. Despite the museum's spotless
reputation, Miss Estaban quickly realized you don't just drop people a note
asking to borrow their Picasso. Three years of repeated phone calls, travel all
over Europe and the United States, and hundreds of personal, one-on-one meetings
came and went before she managed to collect the 120 works by the Spanish
expatriate for her show. One might think--given the fact that often this 20th
century master turned out more work in a single year than many artists have in
an entire lifetime--his work, despite his popularity, or conversely, perhaps
because of it, would be relatively easy to come by. Not so in either case. It
would seem that, unlike the work of many modern artists, people really
become attached to their Picassos. Even museums find them hard to part with,
even for a few months.
Women of Algiers, After Delacroix, 1955, Pablo Picassso |
Add to this the enormous insurance and shipping costs and a Picasso show is
not only difficult, but exceedingly expensive to mount. This show drew holdings
from the Museum of Modern Art in New York as well as from private collections in
Japan, the US, London, and elsewhere in Europe. The show concentrated on
Picasso's most prolific period, stretching from 1952 until his death in 1973 at
the age of 91. It included several of his tribute pieces such as Women of
Algiers, After Delacroix, Las Meninas, After Velázquez, and such original
compositions as The Painter and his Model and Shade. Of course, in arranging
such a show, it helps to have the painter's son, Claude, on your side too. Miss
Estaban even managed to borrow Velázquez’s original Las Meninas to hang next to
Picasso's tribute to one of the most influential artists in his life. And, while
Picasso has often been criticised for "stealing" the work of the artists he
admired most, side-by-side comparisons reveal instead a face-to-face
confrontation on the part of the artist with the same creative process as
experienced by Velázquez and others. The tributes were pure Picasso with little
more than passing resemblances to the work of the ancient masters he worshiped.
And inasmuch as Picasso lived most of his life in Paris, this show marked a rare
chance for Spaniards to see firsthand the works of the countryman they share
with their neighbour to the north.
Las Meninas, After Velazquez, 1957, Pablo Picasso |
I've never seen "After Velazquez" before. That's pretty awesome.
ReplyDeleteThe problem in dealing with Picasso is that there is so MUCH of his work. Once you get past two or three of his "periods" and two brands of cubism, the plunge into his "tributes," your eyes begin to glaze over. Moreover, the man lived to be 92 and worked practically from his deathbed. Add to that being probably the most prolific artist who ever lived and it's little wonder even important works like "After Velazquez" can go largely unnoticed.
ReplyDelete