College art class, circa 1920--Survival of the fittest. |
As an art educator in one form or another over the past forty-some years, it's interesting to see how the art and science of training young artists has changed, first in just my lifetime, as well as over centuries past. Even in just the past hundred years, much has changed. For instance, a hundred years ago, as indeed, as far back as the Renaissance, a serious would-be art student, in beginning formal academic training, was already something of an accomplished artist--far moreso than today. Either the adolescent artist learned the basics, how to draw and paint on their own, or from some local hack. There was a very immediate need to prove to parents that his or her talent was sufficient to vest with costly art school training (above) in some form, and, after graduation, there would be the will and the skill to make a living. The talented teenage artist a century ago, lived and breathed art, while all the time likely holding down a part time job to help support the family. I've trained dozens of outstanding artists, and I can't recall ever encountering a single one (myself included) who was that dedicated.
High school art classes today, institutionalized, generalized, homogenized. Creativity rules. Skills...only as needed. |
Today, basic training in art has become institutionalized. As a public school art instructor for twenty-six years, I was part of that. Yet even the best art students I've ever graduated were not as well-trained, not as versatile, nor as adept as early 20th-century art students such as Edward Hopper, Albert Dorne, Norman Rockwell, Georgia O'Keeffe, Jackson Pollock, and any number of others struggling to master their art during the early 1900s. There are two or three pretty good reasons for this. Perhaps first and foremost would be that there are simply too many other activities occupying the adolescent mind and time today. Parents insist their children be "well rounded." Outstanding artists are seldom well-rounded. I know I'm certainly not (except for my belly). Also, today there are so many drawing "aids" (photography, computers, etc.) there is likely not as much need for the present day art student to acquire the exceptional eye-hand coordination artists needed during the early 20th century. And finally, and most recently, there is no longer the need for students in art, or most other fields in fact, to stuff their heads full of facts (Gilbert Stuart painted George Washington), figures (anatomical), and images (Monet's Impression, Sunrise) when such trivialities are instantly available on the Internet and easily converted to whatever format the student might need. Just as schools today are starting to (or already have) quit teaching cursive handwriting, the same is also happening in terms of the age old skills of drawing still-lifes, figures, etc. A hundred years ago, art students were still drawing from plaster casts of the human figure.
Hot Dog Cart, 1938, Jacob Kainen--30s' Social Realism |
Jacob Kainen Self-portrait, 1942, pen, brush and ink on paper. |
Lunch, 1936, Jacob Kainen, WPA print. Some people hardly noticed the Great Depression. |
The Flood, 1937, Jacob Kainen. Though the exact location is unknown (and probably immaterial), this could well be the Muskingum River where I grew up. |
The Tenement Fire, 1934, Jacob Kainen |
Red Flash, (post retirement), Jacob Kainen |
Woodblock Printer, 1940, Jacob Kainen, a trade he knew well. |
When I did my stint on the front lines of art education, my classes weren't quite this much "fun," but they sometimes seemed that way. (Notice the instructor in the upper right corner.) |
No comments:
Post a Comment