La Primavera, c. 1481, Sandro Botticelli |
From the beginning of time, or at least the beginnings of art, there have been,
broadly speaking, four areas of painting content--contemporary, religious,
mythological, and formalistic. The earliest cave paintings were contemporary,
dealing with current events or recent history. Religious works dealt entirely
with various deities. Mythological works probably grew out of Greek religious
content but came to prominence in Western art long after they had lost any
religious following. And finally, in the 20th century, came formalistic content in
which the subject of the art is art itself. At various times though history,
several of these areas have dominated art. If we count painting as having come
into its own during the Renaissance, then we find much of it religious, with
mythology running a distant second but gaining ground. With the Reformation,
contemporary content slowly began to dominate. During the 18th and
19th centuries, mythology replaced religion and contemporary subjects as
the artist's subject of choice. Since Impressionism, contemporary subject matter
has seesawed back and forth with newly important formalistic concerns while
religion and mythology in art became practically non-existent. That's a brief,
breathless history of art in one short blurb.
The Rape of Europa, 1910, Valentin Alexandrovich Serov |
Today, while there, in fact, continues to be a small religious presence in
painting, mythology is dead. Sandro Botticelli is credited with having painted
the first revival of mythological content since Roman times with his
La Primavera (top, 1481). In modern times, Valentin Alexandrovich Serov with his
The Rape of Europa (left) in 1910 may well have been the last artist to
seriously explore Greek mythology in painting. In between, there was the
exuberance of Raphael's Galatea (below, right, 1506), the careful, narrative
choreography of Guido Reni's Atalanta and Hippomenes (bottom, 1612), the Rococo
fantasy of Boucher's Triumph of Venus, (1740) and the medieval longings
of Edward Burne-Jones' King Arthur in Avalon.
That's not to say we have no taste for mythology today. Movies and television
love it. But movies and television are well suited for telling the moralistic
stories for which mythology is famous. It's entertaining, intellectual,
adventurous, sexually exciting escapism.
Triumph of Galatea, 1514, Raphael |
Today, painting takes itself too
seriously for any such foolishness. Moreover, today, if artists even know or
care about mythology, they are ill-equipped to deal with it visually. Painted
mythology demands a familiarity with the subject matter that most people
(including artists) simply don't have. Or, it demands the ability and
willingness on the part of the painter to visually expound upon the arcane antiquities
of the subject which few if any artists possess. All of which would
be of little consequence except that with religious painting seemingly following
the same path to oblivion, we find relegated to benign obscurity fully half the
traditional subject areas of the painter's art. And that's both sad and
frightening.
Atalanta and Hippomenes, 1612, Guido Reni |
No comments:
Post a Comment