Having set forth a list of the greatest paintings of
the last thousand years, I probably raised some eyebrows not so much for the
artists and paintings I chose but those I didn't mention. Everyone has their
favorite artists and I'm no exception. I tried not to let favoritism play a part
in my selection, and, indeed, some of the paintings I mentioned are definitely
not among my favorites. I'm starting to feel like a self-appointed, one-man
jury in the greatest art show of all time. Very well, having awarded prizes for
the ten best, I think I should now list the "also-rans" who richly deserve at
least an "Honorable Mention" ribbon. I had intended to list only ten but ended
up with at least fourteen. I whittled away somewhat at that list but still ended
up with eleven, which is, at least, close to ten. In no particular order they
are:
Peter Paul Rubens:
Triptych of the Descent
from the Cross, 1612-14, Cathedral of Our Lady, Antwerp. Like Michelangelo's
ceiling, this work involves multiple paintings, each one exquisite in its own
way, though unlike Michelangelo, only the central panel depicting the actual
descent from the cross can really be considered a masterpiece. What must have
been a clumsy, awkward undertaking in reality, comes across with a powerful,
loving grace that is as deeply moving as it is beautiful.
|
Sunday Afternoon on the Island of La Grande Jatte, 1884-86, Georges Seurat |
Georges Seurat:
Sunday Afternoon on the Island of La Grande Jatte, 1884-86, Art Institute of
Chicago. While technically, a breakthrough in the use of color and a sort of
"scientific Impressionism," the overall scene is one of stiff formality in no
way capturing the relaxed, playful quality of the setting. Too much attention to
technique, not enough warmth to break a sweat.
|
The Bathers, 1906, Paul Cezanne |
Paul Cezanne:
The
Bathers, 1900-05, National Gallery, London. I felt terribly guilty leaving
Cezanne out of the original ten, but it was impossible to come up with
one work
that stood out above his others. And even the choice of this painting is
somewhat arbitrary in that he is probably best known for his landscapes. Here
though, there is the element of landscape amongst his figures, which are more
still-life objects as living "bathing beauties."
|
The Raft of the Medusa, 1819, Theodore Gericault |
Theodore Gericault:
The
Raft of the Medusa, 1819, Musee du Louvre, Paris. The choice here was not so
much which painting but which artist in that Eugene Delacroix was a Romantic
artist of equal stature and his outstanding
Liberty Leading the People is at
least as dramatic. However the award goes to the work having the greatest impact
on art from this much misunderstood era, and here, without question, "The Raft"
in its depiction of a scandalous, actual event, edges out the
competition.
|
The Holy Trinity, 1426-28, Masaccio |
Masaccio:
The Holy Trinity, 1426-28, Santa Maria Novella,
Florence. Probably the greatest pre-Michelangelo fresco, I narrowly had to give
Giotto the top billing in that his
Lamentation Over the Dead Christ was
earlier and had a more profound effect upon fresco painting (including the work
of Masaccio), even though this work is much more complex in composition and
technically superior (as well it should be having been done 125 years
later).
|
Oath of the Horatii, 1784, Jacques-Louis David |
Jacques-Louis David:
The Oath of the Horatii, 1784, Musee du
Louvre, Paris. The kickoff to the Classical era in painting, undoubtedly David's
most outstanding work. The problem I had with it was not the painting itself
(who could fault David technically) but with the violent, melodramatic, sexist
theme of the work. Often touted as the first painting of the modern era, if
that's the case, it mostly serves to underscore how different the
Postmodern era
has become when wars can be fought and
won by remote control rather than
blood.
|
Impression, Sunrise, 1872, Claude Monet |
Claude Monet:
Impression, Sunrise, 1872, Musee Marmottan, Paris.
Like Cezanne, Monet was difficult to pass over in the original ten, as was this
painting. But again, there are so many
good Monet's and so few
great ones. This
painting, while an excellent example of what Impressionism was all about, had
little impact on either Impressionism or Art. Its chief claim to fame is its
impact on a single journalist/critic in his derogatory coining of the word
"Impressionism."
|
The Fighting Temeraire Tugged to Her Last
Berth to be Broken up, 1838, JMW Turner |
J.M.W. Turner:
The Fighting Temeraire tugged to her
last Berth to be broken up, 1838, National Gallery, London. Turner, as a
precursor to Impressionism, was hard to omit from the "big ten" and this is as
good as he gets. The problem was, Turner was little appreciated by his
contemporaries and had a far greater effect upon
American art than he did on the
mainstream English or French painters who largely had to "rediscover" during the
Impressionist era, that which he'd already known some forty years before.
(Notice I didn't include any Impressionists in my original top ten
either.)
|
The Third of May, 1808: the Firing Squad on Mount Pius, 1814, Frncisco Goya |
Francisco Goya:
The Third of May, 1808: The firing Squad on
Mount Pius, 1814, Museo del Prado, Madrid. A very strong,
journalistic/propagandist work with few precedents in painting at the time, and
unfortunately, few antecedents, at least until Picasso's
Guernica a 130 years
later. Goya is a much-underrated painter who deserves better.
|
The School of Athens, 1509-10, Raphaello de Sanzio |
Raphaello
de Sanzio:
The School of Athens, 1509-10, Stanza della Segnatura, Vatican
City. Had he not stood in the shadow of Michelangelo, Raphael might well be
considered the most outstanding painter of the Renaissance. However, had it not
been for Michelangelo, he might have been known only for his syrupy-sweet
Madonnas. This outstanding, thought-provoking work, painted while Michelangelo
was at work nearby in the Sistine Chapel (Michelangelo accused Raphael of
"spying" on him), certainly proves him to have been a fast learner.
There
you have it. Even though I've listed them as "also-rans", none of them are
second-rate artists. And notice I've not included other outstanding work by any
of the "big ten" even though paintings such as Picasso's
Guernica, Manet's
Olympia, or Leonardo's
Last Supper, for instance, had a greater impact on
the development of Western art than did some of these. But I've not listed
those in an effort to spread the spotlight focus a little broader, bringing to
light art and artists that
should have had a greater importance in art history
than they did.
Interesting list. I'm definitely with you on the Seurat.
ReplyDelete